Sergi Perez Contri vs Marcel Zielinski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When comparing recent second serve performance, Contri has a slight edge, winning 41.35% of points compared to Zielinski's 40.93%.
• In return game stats, Zielinski performs marginally better on both second serve returns (47.42% vs. 47.17%) and first serve returns (35.25% vs. 33.49%).
• Under pressure, Zielinski has a slight advantage, saving 52.41% of breakpoints against Contri's 52.17%.
• Assessing overall performance, Zielinski has a higher win rate over the last year (66.67% vs. 61.04%). Could this indicate a stronger potential for victory?
• Contri excels on Clay courts with a 55% win rate, whereas Zielinski's best surface is Hard, winning 64% of matches.
• Both players primarily compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with Zielinski achieving a better win rate of 69.39% compared to Contri's 61.84%.
• The head-to-head record leans in favor of Zielinski, having won their sole encounter, including the deciding set.
• In high-pressure situations such as deciding sets, Zielinski's 67% win rate surpasses Contri's 43%.
• Contri generally competes against lower-ranked opponents with an average rank of 421.42, whereas Zielinski faces stronger competition with an average rank of 243.8.
• Regarding break point conversion, Zielinski has a notable advantage, converting 46.85% of opportunities compared to Contri's 41.08%. How might this impact the expected outcome?

Editorial Prediction (July 23, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the potential outcome of this match, it's clear that both players have their particular strengths. Contri boasts a slightly superior recent second serve performance, yet Zielinski counterbalances this with stronger return stats.

Examining their records under pressure reveals that Zielinski has a marginal edge in saving breakpoints, an important aspect when predicting close matches.

Contri shines on Clay surfaces, whereas Zielinski has demonstrated impressive capability on Hard courts. The match's surface could be a deciding factor.

When assessing their overall performance, Zielinski's higher win rate over the last year and head-to-head advantage suggests an upper hand.

Considering Zielinski's stronger performance against higher-ranked opponents, alongside superior breakpoint conversion rates, it appears Zielinski is likely to emerge victorious in this encounter.